Friday , July 1 2022

Court to hear plea against Article 35A-Kashmir

People in Kashmir have their eyes on India’s Supreme Court, which is set to hear a plea against Article 35A that gives special status to Indian-administered Kashmir.

Altaf Sheikh, owner of a popular cafe at Srinagar’s Residency Road – the busiest shopping street in the main city of the disputed region – is worried that India’s Hindu nationalist government wants to bring about demographic change in the Muslim-majority territory.

Hindu nationalists have campaigned against Article 35A enshrined in India’s constitution that bars Indians from buying land in the disputed region.

Sheikh, like other Kashmiris, fears New Delhi wants to settle outsiders and reduce Muslims to a minority.

“Examples of Palestine, Syria, and now Rohingya are before us. Will the world afford Kashmir becoming one of these in the future?” he asks.

An NGO called “We the Citizens” and a think-tank backed by Hindu supremacist Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) have filed a plea to remove the article.

The Congress party, that has ruled Indiafor most of the past seven decades, had challenged such petitions whenever they were filed in the past.

 

India couldn’t change the demography of Kashmir politically or militarily. Now, it’s using its judiciary card
MIRWAIZ UMAR FAROOQ, SEPARATIST LEADER

But the federal government, led by the right-wing Bharatiya Janata party (BJP), which also rules disputed Kashmir in alliance with regional People’s Democratic Party (PDP), hasn’t contested the petition, raising fears in Kashmir that the party is finally on its way to abolish these provisions using judicial means.

A new storm is looming over the region that has seen unrest in the past three years amid hardline policies pushed by the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

“I worry about the future of my children. We have already faced worst war crimes here. Kashmiris may mass-migrate,” said Iftikhar Ahmad, an autorickshaw driver.

“But our borders with Pakistan are landmined. Where will we immigrate to?” he asked.

Property rights to the outsiders
Article 35A provision was introduced through a presidential order in 1954 to continue the old provisions of the territory regulations under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution – which denies property rights to the outsiders in the region and allows Kashmir to have its own constitution and a separate flag.

The provisions continue from the time when Kashmir was a separate kingdom ruled by Hindu Dogra rulers. In 1947, when the British colonialists vacated the subcontinent, Maharaja Hari Singh signed the instrument of accession with India that was disputed by Pakistan.

In its original shape, constitutional laws like Article 35A and Article 370 prohibited Indians or any foreigner from entering Kashmir without a permit. Later, such laws were watered down. So, when a Hindu nationalist politician, Syama Prasad Mookerjee, the founding father of Bharatiya Jana Sangh and a precursor to the ruling BJP – entered the state in 1953 without a permit, he was arrested and died in prison.

Mookerjee’s death offered an impetus for the BJP to work on the elimination of Article 35A and Article 370 that continues till today.

“We stand by his (Mookerjee’s) sacrifices. We’ll never back down from his commitment to these provisions,” senior BJP leader Ashok Kaul told.

Under Article 370, India was supposed to control only communication, foreign office and defence of Kashmir, but over the decades New Delhi has eroded many of the special provisions.

The PDP government in the state, however, is defending the Article in the top court, which will hear the case on Monday.

“We have a strong case. We will strengthen the status of the state, not diminish it,” the PDP spokesperson Waheed Ur Rehman Parra told.

When asked that its coalition partner BJP was not challenging the petitions, Parra said, “Both parties intend to work for peace and integration”.

“… You may differ in a democracy. We are two different ideologies but it doesn’t mean we can’t co-exist together.”

The PDP has received criticism for its handling of the issue.

 

Senior advocate Syed Tassadque Hussain told that PDP is “ill-prepared” to fight the case.

‘Right to revolt’
Likening a US Supreme Court judgment in a petition regarding a case on civil rights of Indian tribes, Hussain said, “the US court ruled that the question has already been adjudged and is barred by the principals of res judicata to re-examine it.”

Res Judicata means “the matter has already been adjudged” and is sometimes evoked by the courts to dismiss the case for being useless.

“The Kashmir government should have used this case as counter-argument,” he said adding, “also under Res Judicata principle, the Indian court lacks jurisdiction on this case.”

Hussain doesn’t rule out major revolt in Kashmir if the court removes these provisions.

“Situation will arise which arose in the Dred Scott case in the US. That means although the law declared by the top court is binding upon all authorities within the territory of India, yet people have a right to revolt.”

The pro-independence groups say they will call for “massive rage in Kashmir streets” the day the provision is removed.

“We’ve called for a massive agitation,” pro-resistance leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq told.

“India couldn’t change the demography of Kashmir politically or militarily. Now, it’s using its judiciary card,” said Farooq, the head of the moderate faction of All Parties Hurriyat Conference.

Farooq added that the Indian court doesn’t have “any jurisdiction in the disputed territory”.

Kashmiris fear demographic changes are part of New Delhi’s plan to alter the outcome of a future plebiscite in favour of India if it’s ever conducted to settle the sovereignty of Kashmir disputed by India and Pakistan, who govern parts of the territory since 1947.

 

PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE

The act of charity is very noble and highly admired by Allah (SWT). Just do it for the right people.
Voice of Muslim has been conveying the message of Islam to Muslims and non-Muslims. The aim is to make people aware of the factual news of Islam and the correct Islamic message
وائس آف مسلم مسلمانوں اور غیر مسلموں تک اسلام کا پیغام پہنچاتی رہی ہے۔ اس کا مقصد لوگوں کو اسلام کی حقیقت سے متعلق خبروں اور صحیح اسلامی پیغام سے آگاہ کرنا ہے
The Voice of Muslim independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. …We are relying principally on contributions from readers and concerned citizens.
Your valuable contribution can save a life or make a difference to the quality of another human life, indirectly contributing to the social & economic stability of the community at large.
برائے کرم امداد کریں! Support us as per your devotion !
www.voiceofmuslim.in (since 2017)
Voice of Muslim
Account Details-
Acount Name :- VOICE OF MUSLIM
Bank Name :- STATE BANK OF INDIA
A/c No. :- 39107303983
IFSC CODE : – SBIN0005679
PAYTM MOBILE NO. 9005000008
Please share this message in community and be a part of this mission

About voiceofmuslim

Voice of Muslim is a new Muslim Media Platform with a unique approach to bring Muslims around the world closer and lighting the way for a better future.
SUPPORT US

Powered by themekiller.com anime4online.com animextoon.com apk4phone.com tengag.com moviekillers.com